“Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names cannot harm me!” But – we call each other names, from the playground onwards, mostly in a harmless way. Today, of course, the law recognises that names can and do harm and hurt. Especially where equality is concerned. Especially where racism is at hand.

But names change. We can all get confused in this political correct society to which we belong.

Equality must be the norm, going hand in hand with respect; respect of each other regardless of race. Still, however, in the 21st century we are caught up with sins of yesterday and some groups continue to suffer.

Racism is created and reproduced out of a complex set of circumstances. A variety of attitudes, practices and behaviour (perhaps neither overt nor intentional) can discriminate against groups of people.

So, bodies like ISPAL, and each of us as individuals, face a minefield of what to say and what not to say. Some boundaries are clear. Words like “half-caste” and “mixed race” are gone from acceptable language - so is “immigrants”. Public policy commonly refers to “minority”, “ethnic/black” and “BME”.

“Minority ethnic” is preferred to “ethnic minority” because it stresses that everyone belongs to an ethnic group, but which strictly is correct? Roger Clifton of Vaga Associates states; “it depends on who you speak to as to which is preferred but neither is unacceptable”.

ISPAL supports both the CRE and Sporting Equals, who show clear leadership as we walk on potentially hurtful ground. Once offence has occurred then the mine has exploded. ISPAL policy is be consistent, agree a house style and stick to it. Most of us are proud of our heritage and keen to discuss it!

Image: copyright Andrea Gingerich www.istock.com